Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
 
 
Russia Plays Big Role in Impeachment   11/18 07:01

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- For all the talk about Ukraine in the House impeachment 
inquiry, there's a character standing just off-stage with a dominant role in 
this tale of international intrigue: Russia.

   As has so often been the case since President Donald Trump took office, 
Moscow provides the mood music for the unfolding political drama.

   "With you, Mr. President, all roads lead to Putin," House Speaker Nancy 
Pelosi declared last week, and not for the first time.

   The impeachment investigation is centered on allegations that Trump tried to 
pressure Ukraine's new leader over the summer to dig up dirt on Trump political 
rival Joe Biden, holding up U.S. military aid to the Eastern European nation as 
leverage.

   In her testimony before the House impeachment panel last week, diplomat 
Marie Yovanovitch suggested that the president's actions played into the hands 
of Vladimir Putin, whose government has backed separatists in a five-year-old 
war in eastern Ukraine.

   Yovanovitch, a 33-year veteran of the State Department known for fighting 
corruption in Ukraine and elsewhere, was ousted from her position as ambassador 
to Ukraine after Trump and his allies began attacking her and claimed she was 
bad-mouthing the president.

   Her ouster, she and several Democratic lawmakers argued, ultimately 
benefitted Putin.

   "How is it that foreign corrupt interests can manipulate our government?" 
Yovanovitch asked House investigators. "Which country's interests are served 
when the very corrupt behavior we've been criticizing is allowed to prevail? 
Such conduct undermines the U.S., exposes our friends and widens the playing 
field for autocrats like President Putin."

   After two days of public testimony and the release of thousands of pages of 
transcripts from witnesses who've met with investigators behind closed doors, 
Democratic and Republican lawmakers seem further entrenched in their partisan 
corners about whether the president abused his powers.

   Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to do him a "a favor" 
and investigate Biden and his son Hunter's business dealings in Ukraine. At the 
same time, Ukraine was awaiting nearly $400 million in U.S. military aid.

   While Democrats say the request to investigate the Bidens represented a quid 
pro quo, Trump insists he was within his rights to ask the country to look into 
corruption. Democrats, trying to make their accusations more understandable, 
have now settled on framing the president's actions as a matter of bribery, 
which, as Pelosi noted, is mentioned in the Constitution.

   Hunter Biden served on the board of a Ukrainian gas company at the same time 
his father was leading the Obama administration's diplomatic dealings with 
Kyiv. Though the timing raised concerns among anti-corruption advocates, there 
has been no evidence of wrongdoing by either the former vice president or his 
son.

   Trump has dismissed the impeachment proceedings as a "joke" that deny him 
and Republican lawmakers due process.

   A key ally on Capitol Hill, Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., casts the 
impeachment inquiry as a continuation of the Democrats' "spectacular implosion 
of their Russia hoax."

   "In the blink of an eye, we're asked to simply forget about Democrats on 
this committee falsely claiming they had more than circumstantial evidence of 
collusion between President Trump and Russians," Nunes said.

   Democrats, for their part, are trying to brighten the spotlight on their 
theory that Trump is doing the bidding of Putin.

   Russia, a historic adversary of the United States, has too often emerged as 
a benefactor of Trump's actions, says Rep. Ted Lieu, a California Democrat.

   In his July call with Zelenskiy, Trump pushed discredited information that 
hackers in Ukraine --- rather than Russia --- interfered in the 2016 elections.

   Last month, Trump abruptly moved U.S. Special Forces from northern Syria at 
Turkey's urging and as result created a security vacuum for Russia to fill.

   Trump has also repeatedly disparaged and even suggested withdrawing from 
NATO, the military alliance that has served as a deterrent to Soviet and Russia 
aggression since it was formed after World War II.

   "It's clear that the Trump administration foreign policy is chaotic and 
incoherent with one exception: Many of his actions benefit Russia," Lieu said.

   Both in open hearings and closed-door testimony, Democrats have sought to 
highlight concerns that Trump's foreign policy frequently benefits Russia.

   The concerns about Moscow linger even after special counsel Robert Mueller's 
nearly two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election 
dogged Trump for much of his first term and led to the conviction of five 
campaign advisers or close associates of the president.

   Mueller, a former FBI director, did not clear Trump of wrongdoing when he 
ended the probe nor did he allege the president committed misconduct.

   "If Putin doesn't have something on him, he's doing all this for some 
bizarre reason," said Rep. Mike Quigley, an Illinois Democrat who sits on the 
House Intelligence Committee.

   In her testimony before impeachment investigators last month, Fiona Hill, 
until July the Russia analyst on the National Security Council, delivered an 
impassioned warning that the United States' faltering resistance to conspiracy 
theories and corruption represents a self-inflicted crisis and renders the 
country vulnerable to its enemies.

   "The Russians, you know, can't basically exploit cleavages if there are not 
cleavages," she said. "The Russians can't exploit corruption if there's not 
corruption. They can't exploit alternative narratives if those alternative 
narratives are not out there and getting credence. What the Russians do is they 
exploit things that already exist."

   Other witnesses, including Deputy Secretary of State George Kent and 
Ambassador William Taylor, the acting chief Ukraine envoy, also testified that 
Russia was the chief beneficiary of Trump's decision to hold up military aid to 
Ukraine.

   "Our holding up of security systems that would go to a country that is 
fighting aggression from Russia for no good policy reason, no good substantive 
reason, no good national security reason is wrong," said Taylor.

   U.S. diplomats also worried that the hold on the security assistance would 
undercut Zelenskiy, whom they viewed as a reformer in a nation that has 
repeatedly endured tumult spurred by endemic corruption.

   "I think the signal that there is controversy and question about the U.S. 
support of Ukraine sends the signal to Vladimir Putin that he can leverage that 
as he seeks to negotiate with not only Ukraine but other countries," Kent said.


(KR)

 
Tillman Producers Coop | Copyright 2019
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN